Alissa Golob and Scott Hayward, co-founders.
[Source]
Let's Adore Jesus-Eucharist! | Home >> Directory of sheep and wolves
Alissa Golob and Scott Hayward, co-founders.
[Source]
1) S. Hayward (2018-Feb-07)
2) S. Jetchick (2018-Feb-13)
3) S. Hayward (2018-Feb-15)
4) S. Jetchick (2018-Feb-16)
5) What's wrong with their approach, again (2018-Oct-01)
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: RightNow in Quebec City Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 14:55:44 -0500 From: Scott Hayward To: @proviequebec.ca Hi Stefan, My name is Scott Hayward and I'm the co-founder of a political pro-life organization called RightNow (www.itstartsrightnow.ca). I'm heading out to Halifax this weekend and would like to stop by in Quebec City on my way back to talk with pro-lifers about what we do, what we have accomplished, and what we can accomplish in Quebec. Do you think you can help me connect with pro-lifers in Quebec City? Thank you. Kindest regards, -- *Scott Hayward, BBA, CA, CPA* Co-founder, RightNow @itstartsrightnow.ca 204-573-0296 (c)
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Correspondence with www.ItStartsRightNow.ca Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:20:24 -0500 From: Stefan Jetchick To: @itstartsrightnow.ca, CC: @endthekilling.ca, Taylor, Rod, @campaignlifecoalition.com, @cqv.qc.ca Hello again Mr. Scott Hayward, Terribly sorry I gave you a rather cold reception this past Thursday. I was banging my head on a translation contract at the Château Frontenac for the National Judicial Institute, I had no idea who you were, and I didn't have time to give your e-mail the attention it deserved. Now I'm back to being unemployed, so I have time to think and write. First of all, I wanted to congratulate both Alissa Golob and yourself for your efforts to protect children still in their Mother's womb. (Actually, we're getting so satanic here in Canada, that even outside the Mother's womb babies are being threatened!) We do need pro-lifers to stop the genocide. Second, I wanted to congratulate you for getting involved in Politics. I've been pounding that drum for many years, rather unsuccessfully, so I can only rejoice at the sight of people who don't just pray the Rosary in the dark, behind the closed door of their bedroom closet. (Please don't take that as mocking the power of prayer; I'm just mocking a heresy that disfigures the power of prayer.) That being said (and I'm sure I could find many more good things to say about your effort, among others your web site which I find rather pleasing to the eye, etc.), I do have some questions. First, I'm getting a bit confused, with all the different pro-life organizations out there. If I try to wrap my head around "The Pro-Life Movement", it seems like it could be divided into at least 5 categories (I'm making up their names as I go along, sorry): 1) "Rusks and nappies". (Baby cookies and diapers, in British-speak.) These groups stay very far away from politics and religion, and just concentrate on helping women who decide to give birth instead of killing their baby; 2) Purely religious. These groups approach the problem squarely from the religious angle (e.g. any FSSP Parish); 3) Educational. These groups try to wake people up and teach them about abortion (e.g. the Canadian Center for Bio-Ethical Reform) 4) Purely political. These groups attack the genocide from the Political angle, but more specifically with a political party (e.g. the CHP, the only pro-life political party at the federal level in Canada, as far as I know); 5) "Non-Partisan" Political. These groups also take the political approach, but without being a political party, normally by encouraging pro-life candidates, whatever their political party affiliation. This last category, to the best of my understanding, includes groups such as: 5.1) Campaign Life Coalition (the group you seem to be a spin-off of) 5.2) We Need A Law 5.3) Right Now (your group) - (Dear other visitors of this web site: If I'm missing your group here, please send me an e-mail and I'll add it!) Since my donation dollars and spare time are limited, I'd like to know which one of these groups I should be supporting with my time and money (or at least by directing toward them the visitors of my web site, i.e. by giving them good publicity). The only information I currently have is a rumor about a painful falling-out with the CLC, apparently revolving around proposing "gestational legislation". Is there a page on your web site where you list all organizations in Canada that roughly attempt to do what you do, and what are their advantages and disadvantages compared to your organization? And while we are thinking out loud, why limit ourselves to "intra-category" reflexions? In other words, why should we be in "Category 5" here above? Why not 4, or 3, etc.? I ask these questions, because like you I observe that the Pro-Life Movement has basically lost all its battles in Canada. I'm not saying we should surrender! Or that all Pro-Life warriors are stupid and lazy! I'm just observing that we are getting our butts kicked by the sickest, most corrupt leaders in the History of Canada (see for example here, here, here, etc.) Either God is Pro-Choice, or we are doing something wrong. (And of course I don't think God is in favor of baby-killing!) So what are we doing wrong? What should we be doing instead? What are the good things we are currently doing that we must do even more, and what are the dumb things we need to stop doing? I ask all these questions because I myself am trying to "strategize" (to use a fashionable term). I've tried many things over the years, including trying to get myself elected 5 times as a Canadian MP, helping organize the Life Chain in my city every year since 2006, handing out over 4000 "kamikaze" flyers in my city, almost founding a new political party, and even trying to become a Catholic Priest, etc. If you have a brilliant solution, or even a partial solution, or even just some insights as to what we should be doing, I'd love to hear them! I will post your ideas here on my web site, so all Pro-Life warriors in Canada can benefit from them. Thank you very much! SJJ
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Correspondence with www.ItStartsRightNow.ca Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 08:43:08 -0500 From: Scott Hayward To: Stefan Jetchick Hi Stefan, Thank you for taking the time to write a thoughtful response. I don't think I would disagree with your various categories of the pro-life movement that you provide. Both Alissa and myself used to work at Campaign Life Coalition and we left because we felt that their strategy and direction was not leading to political success for pro-life candidates (and thus pro-life legislation) across Canada. Our organization is focused *solely* on nominating and electing pro-life politicians, both federally and provincially, across Canada. We work closely with other organizations such as the Canadian Centre for Bioethical Reform (focused on changing hearts and minds) and WeNeedALaw (focused on creating and lobbying for pro-life legislation). We have a systematic method of identifying and creating pro- lifer voters in key polls within key ridings across Canada. I will be in Quebec City for a working breakfast tomorrow morning and I'd be more than happy to meet with you afterward before I head to Montreal. Please let me know if you are able to get together. Thank you. Kindest regards,
Hello again Mr. Scott Hayward, Following your invitation which I got last night, I showed up at 10h00 this morning at the Second Cup at 3400 Quatre-Bourgeois for a meeting with you. Since my initial e-mail clearly stated that I wanted to keep our conversation public, and that I wanted to post your answers on my web site, I assumed that was the object of our meeting today. So I was rather taken aback when at the end of our meeting you told me: "This conversation is private", and that you did not grant me permission to reveal what had been discussed (in a very public place, on top of following my very clear request for transparency and openness). Talk about censorship! But just from studying your website, it's pretty clear the specific approach of Ms. Alissa Golob and yourself can be described with: 5.19 5.17 5.11 5.5 5.13 Notice that article has been on my web site for a very long time, and I have not touched it in years. I fairly regularly bump into overt or covert members of the Conservative Party of Canada who, faced with the difficult task of educating Canadians, simply give up the Eight Commandment of God and marvel at how much easier things are, when you don't tell people the truth! If I didn't have to tell the truth, I would be a pretty good "pro-life" salesman too! Cheers, SJJ
There is nothing wrong with eliminating abortion by supporting candidates who are pro-life. As far as I know, it's the only approach. Our laws are made by the Parliament, so we need a majority of Members of Parliament who are pro-life, so we can make our abortion laws consistent with Natural Law.
If the approach chosen by Golob and Hayward did this, I would give them my money and recommend them to everybody I know.
The problem is that Golob and Hayward want mostly to elect candidates. They want to win elections. So the "pro-life" aspect of candidates, in practice, is far less important than what they tell you. What is far more important to them is: are these candidates rich, do they belong to a big party, and do they have a good chance of being elected?
Proof?
I know because Scott Hayward told me in person that, in practice, the only party they encouraged people to vote for was the Conservative Party of Canada. The Christian Heritage Party of Canada was out of the question (they are small and poor).
The Conservative Party of Canada once again has made its will explicit at its National Convention in Halifax, NS, around 2018-Aug-25. The will of the Party is to accept abortion and "gay marriage". Nobody can claim the Conservative Party is pro-life and pro-real marriage; it's in writing, in their own official policies.
Many Canadian political parties have explicit, written policies forbidding candidates from being pro-life (like the Liberal Party of Canada, currently in power). The Conservative Party of Canada doesn't yet have such explicit, written policies. But there are implicit, unwritten policies forbidding truly conservative candidates, as my good buddy François Labrecque found out the hard way.
What makes things even worse is that there is already a mechanism in Canada whereby good Christians are encouraged to vote for pro-life candidates: The CLC Questionnaire. In theory, you just ask your candidates to fill out that questionnaire, and you can find out which ones are pro-life. Except there is a standing order in the Conservative Party of Canada telling candidates not to fill out such questionnaires. I found out when I tried to get my local Conservative candidate to fill it out many years ago. Compare this with a Canadian party that Golob and Hayward refuse to encourage people to vote for:
Look carefully at that document. If you are not pro-life, you are forbidden to be a CHP candidate... Now that is pro-life! And you cannot accuse me of trying to force people to vote for the CHP. I myself would much rather be a member of another Canadian political party, the Christ-The-King Party of Canada!
Let's Adore Jesus-Eucharist! | Home >> Directory of sheep and wolves